Tyler Bowyer Cover-up of Alleged Sexual Assault by Prominent Turning Point Employee

by Brian Ference | News

I previously wrote about an alleged pattern of corruption by Tyler Bowyer and Turning Point including a history of sexual assaults allegations. In response to that story, a new Victim has come forward bringing allegations of a recent sexual assault by prominent Turning Point Action Employee Matthew Martinez and subsequent cover-up by his friend and Chief Operating Officer Tyler Bowyer. See excerpts of the police report below. Martinez has frequently appeared on the Charlie Kirk Show and is heavily promoted as a Turning Point Speaker, leader of trainings in multiple states, and as a data guru who was given credit for drawing the maps for all door knocking and “mastermind behind the math and science”; taking a lead role on elections results and statistics. Martinez is a current board member of the Arizona Young Republicans. A former Turning Point Employee states that “Martinez is the grandson of a large Turning Point donor.”

The Victim alleges that as a junior employee in the months leading up to the recent Trump election, she was working closely with senior employee Martinez and COO Bowyer, with Martinez often acting as her project leader. According to the Victim, Martinez and Bowyer were friends, frequently having dinner and drinks together. Bowyer has frequently publicly complimented Martinez, including after the alleged sexual assault saying “Matthew relentlessly worked to train thousand of ballot chasers, full-time, part-time and volunteer. Our entire Chase the Vote operation, our bedrock Legacy Field Operation and Commit 100 program ran by the wonderful team at HQ deserve monuments.”

Details of the Alleged Sexual Assault by Matthew Martinez

In a written statement of the events from the Victim with identifying details redacted, she writes:

“While in Arizona, I was introduced to and partially trained by Matthew Martinez. Two months later, and Leading up to him coming out to lead our first training, I helped him on several work-related projects. On the first day of training Matthew had asked me if I might show him around a little bit, but I was tired and busy, so I declined. The next day, Matthew asked me if I would drive him to a meeting. He didn’t have a car, so I thought I was being helpful. He told me to expense my mileage because it was for work and that Tyler had approved it. Later during the work week, I offered to take him to see a Basilica he had previously expressed interest in, as I have a strong love for that church. I love building friendships that are founded upon a mutual faith in God. I offered to drive because that was what he had previously asked me to do, considering he had no car. We attended mass but then he mentioned that he had an interview he had to do and would need to step away soon for that. There was terrible cell service, so I drove us to a coffee shop down the road. He did the interview, and afterwards expressed interest in seeing more of the area. We were about five minutes away from a restaurant which I knew very well because I had worked there for two years and was friends with all the staff, so it was someplace I felt comfortable and safe going to.

At this point, I should mention that I do not drink. This was something I mentioned in front of the entire TPA staff during training a few days prior and also mentioned to him at a conversation during lunch on that Monday. He was very aware that I do not drink. Matthew ordered an old fashioned and kept badgering me to order and alcoholic beverage as well. I repeatedly refused and just ordered a water. After he received his drink, he further urged me to drink some. He would not let up, to the point where I had to lift the drink to my lips and pretend to drink a sip so that he would leave me alone.

At this point, our conversation got a little more personal. He asked me to tell him something about myself that nobody knew and made comments about the fact that I hadn’t had a boyfriend in four years, as well as complimenting my eyes. He also mentioned that he loved smoking cigars and cigarettes. I said that I loved the smell, but didn’t smoke myself because it wasn’t good for your health. He began pressing me again, saying that we should stop at a gas station and pick up a carton of cigarettes. He ordered a second drink. He also began to talk about how he was more rebellious than he pretends to be. His tone shifted a bit here, and he talked about how he was something of a rebel. He also mentioned that he is afraid of flying, and needs to drink alcohol before he gets on planes, something he asked me not to mention to his bosses. I was starting to understand that perhaps he and I were different people and maybe our interests didn’t align in the way I had thought.

Although I had considered having dinner, I changed my mind and began insisting that I needed to get home. I told him that I had to see my grandma that evening, so I needed to get back. Despite the fact that his demeanor had changed a bit, I didn’t want to leave him twenty minutes away from his hotel without a car to get back, so I told him I would drive him back to his hotel. After all, he had more tenure at TPA, and so I didn’t want to make him angry with me for leaving him in a rural area, where it is also notoriously hard to call a car service.

Once we got in the car, the oldies’ station I had left on was playing The Beatles song “I Wanna Hold Your Hand”. As I began to drive him back to his hotel, he mentioned the song then took my hand in his. At this point, his entire presence changed. I realized that his intentions with me were physical, something that had (perhaps naively) never crossed my mind before. He asked me to pull the car over to the side of the road so that we could, allegedly, get out and dance together. At this, I started to panic. Again, we were in a very rural area, and if I pulled over the car, there was a very good chance that no one would drive by us for quite some time. I am also very physically small and not strong, and all of his talk about masculinity suddenly came across as much more of a threat than a brag. I tried to laugh off the suggestion, but my heart was now in my throat.

He again started mentioning that he wanted to get cigarettes, but I told him I needed to get home. He told me that I should lie to my grandma and my parents. Instead, he suggested that I spend more time with him. He said he would take me to dinner somewhere. I declined. When we approached a red light as we came closer to his hotel and a more populated area, he leaned across the seat and kissed me. He grabbed my thigh. I was wearing a dress, and this made me panic. Slowly, he crept his hand further and further up and into my thigh until he was touching my underwear. By now, I was so afraid of him, I could hardly speak or think. I was paralyzed with fear.

Then, he said he would go with me back to the office and told me that I should lie to my parents and say we were doing work, insinuating something much more nefarious. Shaking, I declined. Finally, he suggested that we just go back to his hotel room, then. I said I didn’t think that would be a good idea, my voice breaking as I tried not to start crying. He told me to think about it, but then quickly followed that up by stating that I shouldn’t mention any of this at our next training on Monday. Instead, he requested that I not mention anything and go back to being “his admin”. As I pulled into the parking lot of his hotel, he asked me a final time if I would come up to his hotel room with him. I stopped the car in front of the doors to the hotel, and noticing people around, I told him to “Get the f&$% out of my car” in as menacing a tone as I could muster. He leapt out and ran inside his hotel, at which point I started on my way home. Immediately afterwards, he called me twice; I answered neither.

My first reaction was to call my mother. In tears, I told her about what had happened. She kindly advised me to let Turning Point Action Enterprise Director Brett Galaszewski know what had happened. Once I returned back home, I sent him a message letting him know about the incident. Brett called me within a few minutes, asking if I was okay and safe, as well as apologizing for being out of town at present and therefore unable to help prevent the situation from occurring. Brett told me that he would have to let Tyler Bowyer know about the incident as well, and asked if I was okay with Brett informing Tyler; I said that that was absolutely alright. A couple hours later, Tyler called me and asked me to briefly recap what had happened for him. I told Tyler about what had happened with Matthew. Tyler and I were the only two people on this phone call. During this time, he told me that he would be sending Matthew back to Arizona immediately so that he would not be in the following week’s training.

Excerpts from the Police Report

The below excerpts from the police report detail some items of the alleged sexual assault. In typical abuser fashion, the alleged assaulter blames the victim, despite many other details confirming the Victim’s version of events. One key point is that both interviews involve the Victim saying to the Alleged assaulter to “get the f/fuck out of my car”. Does that make sense if the Victim was to blame? Matthew also claims that he “could not answer” certain questions about what happened and “tried to remove a lot of that day from my mind”. Please see the excerpts below:

Chief Operating Officer Tyler Bowyer Inappropriately Takes Over the HR Investigation

According to the Victim and corroborated by additional evidence and interviews, COO Tyler Bowyer inappropriately took over the interview from the HR Department. According to one former Turning Point employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity in fear of retaliation, “Bowyer has a history of being dismissive of women and has had allegations of sexual assault made against himself in the past as well.” and that Bowyer instructed the Victim to “Show Matthew around” and said of this alleged sexual assault case towards the Victim: “It wasn’t that bad and she should just forget it.” and by two accounts, “That Bowyer scheduled Matthew and the Victim to be alone in the office after the (alleged) assault.” If Matthew’s account was correct and the Victim was to blame, why would Bowyer do that when an investigation of sexual assault had been opened?

Responding to an email sent from “Amy” in Turning Point Action Human Relations, Bowyer responds he is moving the date of the HR meeting. According to the Victim “Tyler was leading the investigation and the interview. Essentially I was just meeting with Tyler. It was him just raking me over the coals and asking questions because they had spoken to Matthew first.”

We have already covered that Bowyer and the alleged assaulter Martinez were friends. According to an interview with the Victim, “Tyler and Matthew would post pictures together at dinner. They would hang out together, they frequently travelled together and had beers together down the street from the hotel.”

Turning Point Legal Counsel Sends Intimidation Threat to Victim With No Basis in Law

On April 9th, 2024, Veronica Peterson identifying herself as “Counsel for Turning Point Action” sent an intimidation threat to the victim noting, “upon your commencement of employment with TPA, you signed an Employee Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights Agreement (“NDA”)” and “TPA has been informed that you are actively discussing a confidential investigation that arose from your report of (sexual) harassment by a coworker.” It is interesting that Counsel for Turning Point Action chose to improperly downplay allegations of sexual assault as both the alleged Abuser and Victim specifically mention it as in the police report as simply “harassment”. Peterson goes on to say, “you would be in violation of your NDA and you must cease continuing such communications” and “TPA takes this matter very seriously and is prepared to take appropriate legal action for any continued documented violations of your NDA.”

The problem? These Threats have NO LEGAL BASIS. Legal Precedent is Clear:

“That NDAs are invalid when it comes to sexual assault: Federal Precedent and Legislation Speak Out Act (2022) Citation: Pub. L. No. 117-224, 136 Stat. 2277 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 19401 et seq.) Overview: Signed into law on December 7, 2022, the Speak Out Act renders pre-dispute NDAs unenforceable in cases involving sexual assault or sexual harassment. This federal law prohibits employers from enforcing NDAs signed before a dispute arises (e.g., as part of an employment contract) that would prevent victims from discussing sexual assault or harassment allegations. It applies retroactively to existing NDAs and took effect immediately upon enactment. Significance: This statute establishes a clear public policy exception, prioritizing victims’ ability to speak out over contractual confidentiality obligations.

Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (2022) Citation: Pub. L. No. 117-90, 136 Stat. 26 (codified at 9 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) Overview: Enacted on March 3, 2022, this law allows victims of sexual assault or harassment to opt out of pre-dispute arbitration agreements, which are often paired with NDAs in employment contracts. While not directly targeting NDAs, it undermines their enforceability by ensuring victims can pursue claims in open court, where confidentiality clauses may be challenged. Significance: By giving victims access to public judicial proceedings, this act indirectly weakens NDAs that might otherwise suppress disclosure of sexual assault allegations.

EEOC v. Phoenix Transit System (2000) Citation: NLRB Case 28-CA-15177 (National Labor Relations Board decision, referenced in broader labor law context) Overview: In this case, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found that an employer’s confidentiality rule, akin to an NDA, violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by prohibiting employees from discussing sexual harassment complaints among themselves. While not a direct court precedent, this administrative ruling has been influential in labor law. Significance: The decision suggests that NDAs restricting employees’ rights to discuss workplace sexual misconduct, including assault, may be unenforceable if they infringe on protected concerted activity under federal labor law.”

Turning Point Action and Bowyer also attempted to dismiss the sexual assault and harassment by insinuating “It took place outside of the office and off hours.” According to multiple former Turning Point Action employees, it is very common to work weekends and off hours. Martinez, who the Victim stated she had worked with as a subordinate, “had asked me if I might show him around a little bit, but I was tired and busy, so I declined. The next day, Matthew asked me if I would drive him to a meeting. He didn’t have a car, so I thought I was being helpful. He told me to expense my mileage because it was for work and that Tyler had approved it.”

Again the Legal Precedent is Clear:

“When it comes to workplace sexual harassment occurring outside the office, U.S. courts have established that liability can still apply under certain conditions, rooted in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits sex-based discrimination, including harassment, in employment. The key question is whether the incident is sufficiently connected to the work environment or employment relationship, even if it happens off-site or after hours. Here’s a breakdown based on legal precedent: Employer Liability for Off-Site Conduct: Courts have ruled that employers can be held liable for harassment occurring outside the workplace if it involves coworkers or supervisors and impacts the work environment. For example, in Ferris v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. (2d Cir. 2002), the court found that an employer could be liable for a supervisor’s off-duty assault of an employee during a layover, as it stemmed from their work relationship. The reasoning hinges on whether the conduct “alters the conditions of the victim’s employment” (Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 1993). Work-Related Events: Incidents at company-sponsored events—like holiday parties or retreats—often fall under employer responsibility. In Ocheltree v. Scollon Productions, Inc. (4th Cir. 2003), harassment at an off-site company event was deemed actionable because it was an extension of the workplace.”

A Call to Other Victims to Come Forward Amidst A Developing Pattern of Behavior, Permissive Culture, and Cover-up of Sexual Assaults

All other victims are called upon to come forward with their stories against what appears to be a developing pattern of behavior, permissive culture, and cover-up of sexual assaults. Turning Point Action is called upon to immediately conduct proper investigations without baseless legal threats and intimidation against victims, and take corrective action including intensive sexual harassment and safe environment training of all employees and related organizations and to investigate and take appropriate actions as investigations and up to and including dismissal of any and all employees involved in sexual assaults or cover-ups.

Who Is Scott Presler? Listen to the Spaces Panel Discussion

by Brian Ference | News

Listen to 3 Hour X Spaces Discussion on Who Is the Real Scott Presler and Exposing His False Narratives with Data:

See all the evidence discussed at http://realscottpresler.com

Scott Presler & Turning Point Delivers 2nd Consecutive Crushing Republican Loss Wisconsin after PA

by Brian Ference | News

Scott Presler has denied any fraud occurred in the Lancaster County PA Senate Race which resulted in a historic loss of a seat held for 45 years.

@CauseAmerica reported that 10% of all registrations in Wisconsin “were not living at the address they were registered at” and “Over 141k of those moved out of the state permanently” and “another 197k are registered to vote in the wrong county” with “90k registrations registered to vote at vacant addresses.”

@DerrickEvans4WV reported nearly “5,000 illegal voter registrations on Milwaukee’s voter rolls” but the “city election commission REFUSED to investigate them.”

@RedWave_Press Reported that @DOGE and @elonmusk found over 2 MILLION illegal immigrants who had received Social Security numbers and used them to REGISTER and VOTE. Elon: “And who did vote!” Antonio Gracias: “And we found some by sampling that actually did vote and we have referred them to prosecution at the Homeland Security Investigation Service.”

Why are Turning Point, Scott Presler, and Charlie Kirk ignoring proven fraud, falsely claiming it doesn’t exist, and blaming everyone else under the sun rather than their ballot chasing methods which are proven to be completely useless and do not win elections?

Scott Presler Heavily Fundraised of the Wisconsin Election, Sending Several Nationwide Fundraising Texts and Emails

This author and nearly everyone in the nation apparently received multiple text messages and emails fundraising off Wisconsin. How were these emails and phone numbers obtained and how is this money being used? Certainly not to win elections.

Early Vote Action PAC Created by Scott Presler revealed to receive MULTIPLE Rockefeller donations totaling at least $118,000 in 2024.

by Brian Ference | News

I have written recently about concerns over Political Influencer Scott Presler denying election fraud in the PA Senate Seat race. Pressler claims the loss of the 45 year held Republican seat was due to poor turnout. (this is recently irrefutably proven to be a lie). The Early Vote Action PAC created by Scott Presler has been revealed through FEC filings to have received MULTIPLE donations from the infamous Rockefeller family totaling at least $118,000 in 2024.

The Rockefeller family is one of the most prominent and wealthiest in American history with a history of allegations of corruption and misuse of influence over global systems including:

• Control of the Federal Reserve and Global Banking through Chase Manhattan bank including creation and control of the US Federal Reserve in 1913.
• Involvement with Big Pharma and Medical Industry Domination suppressing natural remedies and profiting from patented drugs through the Rockefeller Foundation.
• New World Order through the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and Trilateral Commission established by David Rockefeller.
• Population Control through funding of eugenics programs in the early 20th century and later global health initiatives including vaccines through the Rockefeller Foundation.
• Corruption of the Education System to eliminate critical thinking and deliver compliant workers based on donations to the University of Chicago and the General Education Board

Scott Presler Exposed Using BOTs, Paid Influencers, or Gov. Intelligence for X Platform Manipulation

by Brian Ference | News

Scott Presler has been exposed in using a BOT army, Paid Influencers, or Government Intelligence Network to manipulate the X platform in a TOS Spam Violation with the phrase “Scott Presler is a national treasure”. Many have seen the near identical propaganda posts that AI bots, paid influencers (think SNAP soda), or government intelligence networks can create (pushing propaganda for Kamala Harris or pro Ukraine/Russia messages). The below images appear to be created by Scott Presler bots, paid influences such as with Turning Point Action or his Early Vote Action App (which Turning Point funded company Superfeed Technologies created) , or which government intelligence networks may have posted:

Now think about the strangeness of calling someone a “national treasure” with their full name; with the majority of them all posted Feb 7th, Feb 8th and Feb 9th, 2025.
Look at these accounts and their profile posts. Many of them are exclusively repots or quotes, a strong signal of AI BOT ACCOUNTS.

Many X Users have Previously Questioned the Utilization of BOT Accounts or Government Intelligence by Presler in the Past:

@EmeraldRobinson said “Behold, the entire fan base of Scott Presler is in the comments section of my tweets day and night! Look at these DoD spooks screaming VOTE EARLY. Really makes you think.”

Others asked “Is this a Presler BOT account? Why are so many pro Presler BOT accounts being pushed”

“Whenever I question Scott Presler my account is attacked in the comments by bots”.

According to @Grok

“X uses the broader umbrella of “platform manipulation” to cover a range of prohibited behaviors. This includes things like coordinated inauthentic activity, spamming, artificially boosting engagement (e.g., through fake accounts or bots), or using misleading tactics to influence visibility.
Spotting a bot account on X can be tricky, but there are some common signs that might suggest an account is automated rather than human-run. Here are a few indications to look out for:
Repetitive Posting Patterns: Bots often post the same content, phrases, or links repeatedly, sometimes at regular intervals or in rapid succession. If an account seems stuck on a loop, it could be a clue.
Generic or Random Username: Many bot accounts have usernames that look like a string of random letters and numbers (e.g., @User12345678) or overly generic handles that don’t suggest a real person.
Low Follower-to-Following Ratio: Bots might follow thousands of accounts but have very few followers in return. This imbalance can indicate mass-following behavior to gain attention.
Lack of Personal Content: If the account’s posts are all promotional, retweets, or generic statements with no personal anecdotes, photos, or interactions, it might lean toward bot territory.
High Posting Volume: Bots can churn out posts at a rate no human could sustain—hundreds or thousands of tweets in a short time frame.
Suspicious Profile Details: A missing or default profile picture (like the egg avatar from X’s early days), no bio, or a bio filled with spammy links can be red flags.
Engagement Without Context: If an account replies to posts with generic comments like “Great point!” or “Check this out!” followed by a link, but the response doesn’t fit the conversation, it might be automated.
Creation Date: Newly created accounts with a flood of activity right off the bat can be suspect. Bots are often disposable and get spun up quickly for specific purposes.”

Take Action and Report these Accounts and Scott Presler’s as Spam and Platform Manipulation (The posts will likely quickly be deleted)

@elonmusk @x @support many of these accounts are likely bots, paid influencers, or government intelligence engaging in platform manipulation against TOS. Please take immediate action.

This Type of Swarm Used Recently by Paid Turning Point Action Employees in Attempt to Influence the Arizona GOP Chairman’s Election

Background on Scott Pressler: 

Scott Presler Denies Election Fraud as PAC Raises Nearly $7 Million – PA Senate Loss Held for 46 yrs

Scott Presler Denies Election Fraud as PAC Raises Nearly $7 Million – PA Senate Seat Held for 46 Straight Years by Republicans Lost in Race He Was “Focused On”

by Brian Ference | News

Scott Presler is being called out by multiple large accounts on X for denying election fraud in the recent Lancaster County, PA Senate seat loss which was previously held by Republicans for over 46 consecutive years. Liz Harrington of War Room said “Something stinks in Pennsylvania… The 36th district has not had a Democrat state Senator “since it moved from Philadelphia to Lancaster County in 1979.” Lancaster County went +16 for Trump just 4 months ago And yet we’re supposed to believe *Republicans* put the Democrat candidate over the top with MAIL-IN votes? I.e. there were more mail-in votes for the Democrat candidate than Democrat voters who requested them.”

Scott Presler denied any fraud in the election saying: “I stand by my comments. You are wrongfully telling people the election was rigged when it wasn’t. You have no evidence that there was any wrongdoing in this election. I was on the ground – you were not. By telling people it’s rigged, you make it harder to win in 2026.”

Presler was next challenged by MJ Truth Ultra saying “This morning, I posted about real concerns all of us had regarding the PA Special Elections that took place. I received an unfriendly message from @ScottPresler demanding me to stop spreading “misinformation”. My concerns were: 1. the vote tallies were within a .89% margin, suggesting an algorithm was used (just like it has been documented in the past.. on record) 2. Democrats always start off with a 30% mail-in ballot lead. I appreciate Scott’s work more than most, but I will not be silenced as a voter who has VERY REAL concerns that still exist that we all can see with our own eyes. Why does Scott Presler not recognize that mail-in ballots and voting machines are still a problem? Even Donald Trump recognizes this and vocally demands we move away from voting machines to paper ballots… and limit mail in voting because it’s ripe with fraud. Everyone should ask Scott why he ignores these issues? Does everyone feel like mail in ballots and voting machines are not an issue anymore? Scott, please read the room.”

Scott Presler’s Heavy Involvement in the Lancaster Count, PA Senate Loss

On March 5, 2025, Presler posted that he was focused on the PA race saying “Right now, I am focused on New Jersey & Pennsylvania.” On March 9, 2025, Presler posted regarding the PA election tagging Republican candidate Josh Parsons and saying “Our Republican candidate is @Josh_Parsons. Join me on Monday to knock on doors & on Tuesday to register voters”.

Presler’s efforts proved ineffective as the 46-year held Republican seat was lost to a Democrat in a shock that resounded through Republicans in Pennsylvania. President Donald Trump has previously called out the 2020 Election in Pennsylvania saying “It was a Very Corrupt Election… I Won by a Lot. You’re Going to Find that Out. The Documents are There!” and “There’s been a lot of cheating going on…People have never seen anything like it, and we have to stop it.”

Philly Patriot provided a graphic questioning mail in ballots (Presler regularly pushes early voting and mail in voting) and raising the potential of fraud in the Pennsylvania 36th Senatorial District:

Presler’s PAC Early Vote Action Raises Over $6,871,279.41 in 2023/2024

Scott Presler’s PAC, Early Vote Action has raised over $6,871,279.41 in 2023 and 2024 according to FEC filings. Many have begun to question the effectiveness of Scott Presler and his methods and what these funds are being used for.

Scott Presler’s Father’s Position as Director of Information Operations in the DASD Called Into Question

Many have called into question Scott’s rise to fame and millions in donations, given that “Rob Presler, Scott Presler’s father, is the Director of Information Operations in the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (DASD) since 2014? One of his specialties is “information operations.”

Role in the Epstein Files Binder Scam & Other Scandals

Scott Presler was recently embarrassed as one of the paid Turning Point Influencers who helped Attorney General Pam Bondi push the infamous Epstein Files binder nothing-burger scam. Investigative Journalist Leah Hoopes said “What in the literal f*ck is this??? Of what motherf*cking qualifications does Scott Presler have to be looking at this binder?? This is ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING! This information belongs to the people,period. Not a gatekeeper ,social media influencer ,who wouldn’t even talk about fraud of the 2020 election. This is @JackPosobiec written all over it.. This is a f*cking joke..a f*cking joke like we need to be spoon fed information.”

In 2016 Presler, was allegedly fired from his work with the Republican Party of Virginia after he “engaged in sexual activity inside a Virginia Beach office the RNC shared with the state party – and posted explicit pictures of the encounter on Craigslist.” He is also accused of doxing RNC committee members emails addresses.

Video: Embattled Tate Brothers Praise Scott Presler and Reveal $10,000 Donation

Andrew and Tristan Tate, currently in the headlines again in the NY Post after recent photos showing choking bruises and alleged sexual assault by Andrew Tate of his girlfriend Bri Stern; in the below video praised Presler and revealed a $10,000 Donation to his PAC. Stern filed a sexual assault report alleging Tate “nearly choked her unconscious during a violent sexual encounter”. Tate is also facing rape charges.

BREAKING: New Grok3 Deep Search Exposes Turning Point, Turning Point Action, and COO Tyler Bowyer

by Brian Ference | News

New Grok3 Deep Search exposes Turning Point, Turning Point Action, and COO Tyler Bowyer. According to the deep research conducted by Grok 3 (which is hailed as “considered revolutionary due to its advanced capabilities in language understanding, creativity, and programming assistance, setting it apart from other AI models on the market. It can understand context, nuance, and subtle tones in human language, making it an incredibly intelligent assistant that comprehends the essence of what users are asking” and “Grok 3’s DeepSearch feature allows it to conduct thorough research across the internet and summarize complex information into actionable insights, enhancing its utility in research and decision-making processes. Grok 3 has been trained with significantly more computational resources, reportedly 10 to 20 times that of Grok 2, leading to enhanced processing and understanding capabilities.”

Per Grok 3 Deep Search:

“Questionable Financial Practices and Insider Enrichment Allegation: TPUSA misrepresented its finances and enriched leaders through questionable dealings, audited by a firm tied to co-founder Bill Montgomery. Evidence: A 2020 ProPublica investigation found TPUSA’s audits came from Montgomery’s former business associate, raising independence concerns. Leaders like Kirk and COO Tyler Bowyer received significant payments via related entities, with $1.2 million in contracts to insiders from 2016–2018. Source: Spies, Mike, and Pearson, Jake. “At This Trump-Favored Charity, Financial Reporting Is Questionable and Insiders Are Cashing In.” ProPublica, July 21, 2020. https://propublica.org/article/at-this-trump-favored-charity-financial-reporting-is-questionable-and-insiders-are-cashing-in… Note: TPUSA’s attorney, Sally Wagenmaker, claimed compliance with IRS rules, but critics argued it violated nonprofit standards.

Sexual Assault and Misconduct at Events Allegation: TPUSA failed to address sexual assault and harassment at its events, creating an unsafe environment. Evidence: Washington Examiner reported in 2018 that former staffers knew of “two or three” assault allegations since 2012, often in TPUSA-funded hotel rooms during summits (e.g., 2017 Student Action Summit). Witnesses described inadequate supervision and unreported incidents. Source: Schoffstall, Joe. “Turning Point USA Struggles with Allegations of Student Sexual Assault, Harassment.” Washington Examiner, June 19, 2018. https://washingtonexaminer.com/news/turning-point-usa-struggles-with-allegations-of-student-sexual-assault-harassment… Note: TPUSA cited privacy concerns and claimed adherence to protocol but didn’t confirm specific actions.

Allegations Against Turning Point Action (TPAction) Illegal Campaign Activity During the 2016 Election Allegation: TPUSA, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit barred from political campaigning, allegedly coordinated with Republican presidential campaigns, including those of Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, violating tax-exempt status rules. Evidence: Jane Mayer of The New Yorker reported in 2017 that TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk emailed pro-Cruz super PAC officials to send student volunteers to South Carolina, while Ginni Thomas (wife of Justice Clarence Thomas) requested students distribute Cruz placards in Wisconsin. A former employee also alleged TPUSA shared 700 student supporters’ data with Rubio’s campaign. Source: Mayer, Jane. “A Conservative Nonprofit That Seeks to Transform College Campuses Faces Allegations of Racial Bias and Illegal Campaign Activity.” The New Yorker, December 21, 2017. https://newyorker.com/news/news-desk/a-conservative-nonprofit-that-seeks-to-transform-college-campuses-faces-allegations-of-racial-bias-and-illegal-campaign-activity… Note: TPUSA denied wrongdoing, calling claims “ludicrous,” but tax experts like Trevor Potter (former FEC commissioner) stated this “crosses the line” for a 501(c)(3).

Funneling Money into Student Government Elections Allegation: TPUSA funneled money into student government elections to influence outcomes, violating university spending caps and transparency rules. Evidence: The Chronicle of Higher Education reported in 2017 that TPUSA-backed candidates at the University of Maryland and Ohio State were forced to drop out after breaching spending rules with undisclosed TPUSA aid. A TPUSA brochure outlined a “Campus Victory Project” to control student governments. Source: Vasquez, Michael. “Inside a Stealth Plan for Political Influence.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, May 7, 2017. https://chronicle.com/article/inside-a-stealth-plan-for-political-influence/… Note: Kirk denied a “secret plan,” but the report cited specific incidents and documents.

Video USS Liberty survivor Phil Tourney and Jake Shields Criticize Charlie Kirk for Calling the Attack a Conspiracy Theory

• • Israeli air and naval forces attacked the USS Liberty with fighter jets, torpedo boats, and napalm. The assault lasted for about two hours.
  • The ship was strafed with cannon fire, hit by torpedoes, and subjected to sustained bombardment.
  • The attack killed 34 American crew members (including sailors, Marines, and one civilian) and wounded 171 others, out of a total crew of 294.

• Multiple U.S. investigations, including a Naval Court of Inquiry in 1967, concluded that the attack was a mistake caused by errors on both sides (e.g., communication failures and misidentification).
• However, many survivors, veterans, and some researchers dispute this, arguing that the attack was deliberate. They point to:
  • The extended duration of the assault, even after the ship’s identity should have been clear.
  • Alleged jamming of the Liberty’s distress signals on frequencies used only by the U.S. military.
  • Claims that Israeli reconnaissance planes had flown over the ship earlier, identifying it as American.
• Critics, including some former U.S. officials like Admiral Thomas Moorer, have called for further investigation, suggesting a cover-up to protect U.S.-Israel relations

Racial Bias and Discrimination Allegation: TPUSA fostered a racist environment, including a senior official’s hateful statements and discriminatory practices. Evidence: The New Yorker (2017) reported that Crystal Clanton, TPUSA’s former national field director, texted, “I hate black people. Like fuck them all … I hate blacks. End of story.” Former employee Gabrielle Fequiere, the only Black field director at the time, described offensive summit rhetoric about Black women. Clanton claimed no recollection; Kirk said TPUSA acted decisively. Source: Mayer, Jane. “A Conservative Nonprofit That Seeks to Transform College Campuses Faces Allegations of Racial Bias and Illegal Campaign Activity.” The New Yorker, December 21, 2017. Note: TPUSA called the accusations “baseless,” but the text message was independently verified.

Failure to Disclose Donors for Political Spending Allegation: TPAction, a 501(c)(4), spent $1.4 million on 2020 election independent expenditures without disclosing donors, violating FEC rules. Evidence: Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a complaint in March 2021, citing FEC reports showing undisclosed donors despite legal requirements post-CREW v. FEC (2018). TPAction amended some reports but disclosed only $34,000 of the total. Source: “CREW Files Complaint Against Turning Point Action.” CREW, March 23, 2021. https://citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-files-complaint-against-turning-point-action/… Note: The FEC has not publicly resolved this; TPAction’s response is unclear.

Operating a “Troll Farm” in 2020 Allegation: TPAction paid teens, including minors, to post pro-Trump content on social media without disclosing affiliations, breaching platform rules and campaign ethics. Evidence: The Washington Post reported in September 2020 that TPAction hired Rally Forge to manage accounts spreading election misinformation (e.g., false mail-in ballot claims). Facebook later banned Rally Forge for “coordinated inauthentic behavior.” Source: Stanley-Becker, Isaac. “Facebook Bans Marketing Firm Running ‘Troll Farm’ for Pro-Trump Youth Group.” The Washington Post, October 8, 2020. https://washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/10/08/facebook-bans-media-consultancy-running-troll-farm-pro-trump-youth-group/… Note: TPAction denied wrongdoing, calling it a “creative solution” to COVID-era restrictions.

Election Fraud Allegations by Senior Leader (2024) Allegation: Austin Smith, a TPAction senior director and Arizona state representative, allegedly forged voter signatures to qualify for the 2024 ballot. Evidence: A lawsuit filed in April 2024, reported by The Washington Post and The Arizona Republic, claimed Smith’s petition sheets showed signatures resembling his handwriting. He resigned from TPAction and withdrew his candidacy. Source: Cathey, Sara. “Turning Point Action Official Resigns After Accusation of Election-Related Fraud.” The Washington Post, April 18, 2024. https://washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/04/18/turning-point-action-official-resigns-after-accusation-election-related-fraud/… Note: Smith called the allegations “silly” and a “coordinated attack,” but evidence prompted his exit. Assault by TPAction Reporters (2023) Allegation: TPAction reporters Kalen D’Almeida and Braden Ellis assaulted queer professor David Boyles at Arizona State University. Evidence: The Guardian and Phoenix’s 12News reported in 2024 that both signed diversion agreements admitting guilt to misdemeanor charges (assault, harassment, disorderly conduct) after accosting Boyles in October 2023. Video evidence supported the incident. Source: Santos, Shanti Escalante-De Mattei. “Two Turning Point USA Members Admit to Assaulting Queer Professor.” The Guardian, April 23, 2024. https://theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/23/turning-point-usa-members-assault-professor-arizona… Note: TPAction claimed it was uninvolved and supported the diversion as a legal tactic, not an admission of organizational fault.

Notes on Scope and Verification These allegations span financial impropriety, campaign violations, racial bias, and physical misconduct, reflecting a pattern of controversy around TPUSA and TPAction’s operations. Sources are drawn from established outlets (The New Yorker, ProPublica, The Washington Post, The Guardian) and watchdog reports (CREW), ensuring credibility over unverified social media claims. TPUSA and TPAction often deny wrongdoing or contextualize actions as lawful, but evidence like documents, witness accounts, and legal filings supports the allegations’ credibility. Some cases (e.g., FEC donor disclosure, January 6 involvement) remain unresolved, limiting definitive conclusions but not the allegations’ initial substantiation. This list is comprehensive as of February 18, 2025, based on available data, and excludes minor or unsubstantiated claims lacking specific evidence or reputable reporting. Below is a list of credible allegations of wrongdoing against Turning Point USA (TPUSA) and its sister organization, Turning Point Action (TPAction), based on available reports from reputable news outlets, watchdog groups, and investigations. I’ve included citations to primary sources where the allegations were documented. “Credible” here refers to allegations supported by specific evidence, such as documents, witness statements, or official complaints, reported by established organizations, rather than unverified rumors or opinions. The list focuses on incidents from recent years, as requested, though some earlier pivotal allegations are included for context where they remain relevant.”

Specifically on TPAction COO and Superfeed Technologies Inc CEO and Chairman of Board Tyler Bowyer:

1. Coordination with Turning Point Action’s “Troll Farm” (2020 Election) Allegation: Bowyer, as COO of Turning Point Action, oversaw a coordinated social media campaign in 2020 that paid young people, including minors, to post pro-Trump content and election misinformation without disclosing their affiliation, likened to a “troll farm.” Evidence: The Washington Post reported in September 2020 that TPAction, under Bowyer’s leadership, instructed participants to make minor edits to identical messages to evade detection by social media platforms. The posts questioned election integrity and downplayed COVID-19 risks. The operation led to Facebook banning TPAction affiliate Jake Hoffman’s firm, Rally Forge, for “coordinated inauthentic behavior.” Hoffman, a close ally of Bowyer, received over $900,000 from TPAction for advertising services during this period, per tax records cited by The Arizona Republic. An independent data science specialist corroborated the coordinated nature of the campaign for The Washington Post, lending analytical weight to the claims. Context and Credibility: The reporting relies on internal TPAction communications, financial records, and platform enforcement actions, making it credible. No lawsuits have directly named Bowyer individually, but his role as COO implicates him in overseeing the operation. TPAction has not denied the campaign’s existence but has framed it as legitimate political advocacy. Critics argue it violated ethical standards and potentially campaign finance disclosure rules, though no legal charges have been filed on this specific issue. Significance: This allegation ties Bowyer to questionable electioneering tactics, raising ethical concerns about TPAction’s operations under his leadership.

2. Negligence in Handling Sexual Assault Allegations at TPUSA Events (2017) Allegation: Bowyer, as COO of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) in 2017, was accused of dismissing requests for increased security at events, contributing to incidents of sexual assault and harassment. Evidence: A Washington Examiner investigation in June 2018 detailed allegations from staffers at TPUSA’s 2017 Student Action Summit. One female staffer reported a college student waking up to a male attendee “groping her and shoving his hands down her pants” after a night of heavy drinking. Staffers claimed they approached Bowyer for additional security (e.g., hiring deputies), but he allegedly responded, “It just wasn’t worth it” and deferred action until “something happens.” Similar incidents were reported at other TPUSA-sponsored events, including the 2017 Road to Majority Conference, though Bowyer was not directly quoted in those instances. Context and Credibility: The allegations come from firsthand accounts of former TPUSA staff, published by a reputable conservative-leaning outlet, lending some credibility. However, TPUSA denied Bowyer rejected security requests, citing existing Secret Service and private security presence at the Summit. No legal action followed, and the claims remain unproven in court. The lack of corroborating legal or documentary evidence (e.g., police reports) weakens the allegation’s weight compared to the fake elector case, but it reflects poorly on TPUSA’s management under Bowyer. Significance: This suggests potential negligence in ensuring attendee safety, though it lacks the concrete legal backing of other allegations.

3. Election Law Violation Complaints (2022 Arizona Primaries) Allegation: Turning Point Action, under Bowyer’s leadership, was accused of illegally coordinating with GOP candidates during the 2022 Arizona primaries, violating its 501(c)(4) nonprofit status rules. Evidence: The Arizona Republic reported on August 2, 2022, that a complaint filed with the Arizona Secretary of State alleged TPAction’s rallies in Mesa and Goodyear were campaign events for specific candidates (e.g., Kari Lake), disguised as “community education” gatherings. The complaint claimed coordination with Turning Point PAC, a related entity. Bowyer described the events as “education-related” but acknowledged TPAction could engage in political work, per IRS guidelines. The Secretary of State sent letters to TPAction affiliates requesting clarification, but no formal charges resulted.

4. 2024 AP News Article on Financial Compensation: “As Kirk’s star has risen, Tyler Bowyer, Turning Point’s chief operating officer, has assumed a greater role in the organization. Like Kirk, his improving financial circumstances coincided with Turning Point’s fundraising success. He now operates Turning Point’s political arm, earning compensation of $255,000 in the group’s 2022 fiscal year. In 2021, he purchased a $1.95 million “urban farm” in Mesa, Arizona, after placing a $650,000 down payment, according to property records. And he has a 2020 Tige ski boat, which sells on the used market for as much as $200,000, that is held under his wife’s name, loan collateral documents show.” https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-trump-turning-point-maga-d08a98e439fa4e902cb756d7e35153db5

• • Source: The Daily Beast (November 5, 2022)
  • Details: Superfeed Technologies, linked to Kari Lake (former Arizona gubernatorial candidate) and other GOP candidates, allegedly provided free mobile app services to political campaigns without reporting these contributions in Arizona campaign finance records. The apps, downloaded by over a thousand Android users and an unspecified number of iPhone users, offered features like social media updates, event notifications, and donation/volunteer portals. Election lawyer James Barton noted that providing such services without compensation would violate Arizona state contribution rules, which prohibit unreported in-kind corporate contributions to campaigns.
  • Evidence:
    • No record exists in Arizona campaign finance filings of payments from Lake’s campaign or related political committees to Superfeed for these services, despite the company explicitly marketing its work for campaigns.
    • Public financial disclosures from Kari Lake indicated she received over $1,000 as a “communication advisor” to FeedMe Inc. (Superfeed’s former name), suggesting a flow of money from Superfeed to Lake rather than the campaign paying for services.
    • Similar apps were developed for other candidates (e.g., Kelly Cooper, Jim Lamon, Austin Smith), with campaign representatives either denying knowledge of invoices or claiming the apps were demos, yet the apps remained active and functional without reported payment.
  • Credibility: This allegation appears credible due to detailed reporting, references to public records, and expert legal opinion. The lack of campaign finance documentation and Superfeed’s silence on the matter bolster the claim. However, no formal legal ruling or investigation outcome is documented in the available data, leaving it as a strong allegation rather than a confirmed violation.

• • • Source: The Daily Beast (February 29, 2024)
    • Details: Superfeed Technologies resurfaced in connection to a bribery scandal involving Kari Lake, where an audio leak revealed Jeff DeWit (former Arizona GOP chair and Superfeed CEO) allegedly offering Lake a bribe to exit the 2024 Senate race. The Daily Beast tied Superfeed to this incident, noting its history of providing apps to Turning Point USA, Turning Point Action, and MAGA influencers, suggesting a pattern of opaque political involvement. The article implies Superfeed’s operations may lack transparency, especially given its leadership’s entanglement in controversial political maneuvers.
    • Evidence:
      • Jeff DeWit’s LinkedIn profile lists him as Superfeed’s CEO, aligning with his role in the bribery audio.
      • Superfeed’s apps for Turning Point entities and GOP figures indicate a deep integration with conservative political networks, raising questions about its financial and operational transparency.
      • No direct evidence ties Superfeed’s corporate actions to the bribery attempt, but its association with DeWit fuels suspicion.
    • Credibility: The bribery allegation against DeWit is credible due to the leaked audio and his resignation from the Arizona GOP chair position following the scandal. However, Superfeed’s direct involvement remains circumstantial—its guilt by association with DeWit is plausible but not substantiated with concrete evidence of corporate misconduct in this specific incident.

CIK (Filer ID Number) Entity Type 0001840131
Entity ID: 1981489
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1840131/000184013121000002/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml

Previous Names: FeedMe JV, LLC, FeedMe, Inc.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1773031/000177303120000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml
https://ecorp.azcc.gov/CommonHelper/GetFilingDocuments?barcode=24021414397464&__ncforminfo=fJw3Q_qTZCQE9K1fBEZSwjauMZjthtglxcgeLaxUn8F46KrmKwBEFfG27tqUtQX9gnnTrNQFs9KaJN9e4C2vQh7siE_AYovl

Tyler Bowyers Lies Caught on Camera

Tyler Bowyer Appointed to Arizona Board of Regents by McCain Lover Jan Brewer

Jan Brewer calls McCain “an American hero, an American icon and an Arizona treasure.” Brewer says she “spent many hours” with McCain, during which she “discovered many of the reasons that I loved him and respected him.” https://azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2019/04/02/jan-brewer-donald-trump-john-mccain/3343660002/…

Con Artist Scott McMahan of Bigger Truth Has His Latest Scam Exposed – Faces 5 Years in Prison

by Brian Ference | News

Known snake-oil salesman, con artist, propaganda fraud, and paid fortune teller Scott McMahan of “Bigger Truth” has had his latest scam exposed.

The County Press reports “County Commissioner McMahan charged with lying about residency on his candidate affidavit”. The article provides further detail that “District 1 Lapeer County Commissioner Scott McMahan, 47 of Columbiaville, was charged with one count of Election Law – False Swearing, a felony punishable by up to five years in prison, for swearing falsely while under oath for the purpose of qualifying as a candidate for elective office.”

An investigation was conducted after allegations that McMahan did not live in the district in which he filed for candidacy which found: “Upon our review of the investigative reports from the Michigan State Police and their request for a warrant, we have found sufficient probable cause evidence alleging that Mr. McMahan did not reside at the address listed in his candidate affidavit when he filed to run for Lapeer County Commissioner in the 1st District,” said John Potbury, deputy chief assistant prosecuting attorney, Genesee County Prosecutor’s Office.

Lapeer County Prosecutor John Miller told The County Press, “I was aware of this investigation taking place and referred it to the office of the Attorney General for appointment of a special prosecutor.”

Gary Howell, Lapeer County Commissioner serving District 2 and the chair of the County Board responded to the charges against McMahan.

“I am concerned, but we need to let the legal process work itself out,” said Howell.

Howell added that if McMahan is found guilty, he’ll have the option of resignation or removal by Michigan’s governor.

For Someone Who Constantly Accuses Others of Being in Cults, McMahan Admits HE Was Involved At Least 2 Separate Sex/Terrorist Cults and Led One as a Guru

In several video episodes, McMahan directly admits his involvement in multiple cults including leading one. Searches reveal multiple failed LLCs in several states tied to McMahan including Living Earth Village which according to a 2011 social media post by McMahan is “a permaculture subdivision concept, where each family creates a space of love for themselves on their own parcel…We will build our own school, community center, resort and spa, retail stores, amphitheater, and more. Our goal is to connect deeply with Nature and practice permaculture on our own land to live prosperous, healthy, and happy lives with our families and neighbors.”

McMahan founded the Living Earth Village cult in Arizona several years ago and according to screenshots found at the bottom of this post, McMahan tried unsuccessfully to raise $400 Million. Along with his art major from Arizona State University (he did not graduate) McMahan lists his primary skills on LinkedIN (profile now deleted) as “magic” and “permaculture”. He admits on video that he was “involved in a cult”

LIVE – Good Friday Special: Scott’s Rescue in Christ https://t.co/d1nKmvPB0V

— Scott McMahan (@BiggerTruth) March 29, 2024

McMahan admits he was indoctrinated by false ideas in college. He also spoke frequently about Rajneesh, an Indian occult guru. “I was in Osho” Rajneesh, also known as Acharya Rajneesh, Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, and later as Osho, was an Indian godman, philosopher, mystic, and founder of the Rajneesh movement. It was recognized as a sex cult. It is worthwhile to point out that Osho engaged in a major election interference campaign. “In the fall of 1984, hundreds of people in The Dalles, Oregon fell ill with salmonella. Members of a cult had sprinkled the bacteria on salad bars in 10 fast-casual restaurants across Wasco County. First came the stomachaches and chills. Then, vomiting spells and diarrhea. Finally, for 45 of them, hospitalization. Though no one died, 751 people fell victim to what remains today the largest bioterror attack in American history, more severe than the anthrax attacks of the early aughts. A CDC probe initially blamed the outbreak on improperly-trained food handlers, but a more exhaustive investigation soon revealed it was the work of the followers of cult leader Baghwan Shree Rajneesh (who called himself Osho). His charisma was so all-encompassing that he managed to amass tens of thousands followers across the world who swore by his freewheeling attitudes towards sex. Many of these acolytes were concentrated in the Oregon city of Antelope, renamed Rajneeshpuram after his followers had migrated there.”

The group had hoped the contamination of ten salad bars would incapacitate so many voters in the Dalles city that their own two candidates would win the Wasco County elections. McMahan joined the cult AFTER this attack, with full knowledge of what they had done.

Troubled Financial Past Creates Opening for RINO Donors to Pay Him For Targeted Propaganda Campaign:

McMahon formerly produced the “Energy Transmission Podcast” and charged $200 for a 1 hour private session, $600 monthly, $1500 quarterly, and $5700 annually for his “services”.

“It didn’t take long for my income to completely dry up”. McMahan admits to several failed ventures including as cult leader and fortune teller. The McMahan Real Estate Team was active from Oct 2015 to March 2021 according to LinkedIN. By his own admission, McMahan was forced to sell his vehicle in 2023 and was “unemployed”. In January 2024, McMahan declared himself a “journalist” and began creating fictional narratives about conservative grassroots political activists. The meat of any of McMahan’s interviews or theories is lies, half-truths, hearsay, and conjecture and avoids any actual evidence like the plague. They frequently include enemies lists and name people to demonize. Where is his funding coming from? In the past, McMahan claimed he was employed by the Lapeer Tribune, however, there is no publishing history there. A search on their site shows zero results.

The following X post from known violent, racist, narcissist grifter RINO Dan Farley clearly shows his connection to McMahan and likely that he was the one who brought him into the Arizona politics.

Farley was recently censured in Maricopa County for trying to destroy the Republican Party and resigned in shame as the Legislative District 4 Chair.

The two are also connected by the “Tea Party”. Dan Farley falsely claims to be a Tea Party President in several states. Below McMahan mentions presenting at a Tea Party Meeting.

Is this another attempt by Farley to create division through lies and trying to destroy the Republican Party? If not Farley, who is paying for McMahan to conduct and produce daily podcast interviews and conduct “hours of research” while not working any type of paid job after a troubled financial past and while going through a divorce?

The answer is simple: the unseen hand of the deep state is funding him. To the real puppeteers, money is no object. When they need more, they print more. Though McMahan is extremely rotten low hanging fruit, if we were to uncover where the money comes from, it would tell a great deal.

McMahan is clearly evidencing loyalties to a group he is not disclosing. The deep state occult loves a devotee, especially one like McMahan who takes perverse pleasure in slandering honest people.

McMahan has publicly supported Ron Desantis over Donald Trump:

McMahan is the Fake Christian He Portrays Others to Be:

According to first-hand witnesses in Michigan, McMahan “advocates for electronic voting, a softened stance on abortion, and claims to be a Christian but in many of his videos slanders Christians and those praying as ‘anarchists’, ‘communists’, ‘cult members’, and ‘extremists’.”

At 11 minutes into the above video, Scott states “there is no Truth in the church and Christianity” and that he “grew up in Sedona Arizona and got involved in new age early” he claims “Dream City church is the center of the disruptors.”

In a “Christian testimony” video on Good Friday, McMahan admits his wife is divorcing him because he “just wanted her affection so much” and “idolized her”. This is a huge narcissistic red flag that points to a delusional megalomaniac complex. McMahan’s wife is certainly not divorcing him for these reasons.

McMahan admits to ordering a “spirit machine” which he knowingly used to deceive others and make money. McMahan claims he has it stored in a closet currently and no longer uses it.

In his Good Friday video, McMahan admits “My mind was tied up in all these knots”. He speaks extensively about Islam and says:

Disturbing Connections to Those Trying to Mislead Hundreds, Cause Division and Confusion, and Destroy the Republican Party

Video of Candace Czarny Running a Meeting

Arizona Daily Independent: Arizona House Representative Joseph Chaplik Caught Lying – Claims Disproved by Video Evidence

by Brian Ference | News

According to the Arizona Daily Independent, Arizona House Representative Joseph Chaplik has been caught lying once again, this time with video evidence disproving his claim that the House Majority Leader Michael Carbone grabbed items from Chaplik’s desk and threw them on the floor. The article stated: “Chaplik lied, and it was a dumb lie, because of course there is video, so he got busted lying in full color”. Chaplik was previously the House Ethics chair and voted with Democrats in the committee that held a hearing on Representative Liz Harris determining she “lied” and ultimately leading to a floor vote which left Harris expelled from office. One article in the Tucson Sentinel read “Liz Harris expelled from Arizona House for lying about conspiracy presentation” and with the quote “Following a House Ethics Committee report released Tuesday that found Harris lied about her actions”.

Will Joseph Chaplik be charged with ethical violations and expelled from the House in the same way as was done to Harris? Or will he receive two-tier justice and special treatment?